Electronic submission: Submissions are only processed online at URL: https://publications.skums.ac.ir

Terms of submission

Unsolicited manuscripts will be considered for publication concerning the considerations below:

1) Originality of the work

2) Not being already published nor being examined in another journal

3) Considering the accepted article the sole property of SKUMS journals and subjected to copyediting before publication.

Note: Submission must be done by one of the authors.

Reporting guidelines have been codified for different types of works, including STROBE for observational studies, CONSORT for randomized trials, PRISMA for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, SPIRIT for study protocols, CARE for Case reports, AGREE for Clinical practice guidelines, COREQ for Qualitative research, ARRIVE for Animal pre-clinical studies, SQUIRE for Quality improvement studies, and STARD for Diagnostic/prognostic studies (search for reporting guidelines for more types of studies). Authors must follow these guidelines since they assist authors in describing the study in sufficient detail so that the work can be examined easily and systematically. Authors of systematic reviews must explain the protocols used for finding, choosing, retrieving, and synthesizing data. Reliable resources of reporting guidelines are the NLM's Research Reporting Guidelines and Initiatives and the EQUATOR Network.

Manuscripts should be in one of the formats below:

Original research must represent research, be methodologically accurate, and be relevant to global health policy and management. A manuscript reporting original research should include a clear aim or hypothesis, design and materials and methods (including study setting, participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sampling, and data), statistical analysis and interpretations, main results, discussion of the findings, study limitations, and the conclusion. An original research article must be written in around 5000 words, including tables, figures, and references, and should present novel observations pertinent to the journal’s scope. The abstract should be structured and include a maximum of 250 words. A total of 6 Tables/Figures are allowed to appear and the number of references should not exceed 45.

A review article (up to ~8000 words, including tables, figures, and references) must include an abstract and discussion of the literature relevant to any subject consistent with the journal’s scope. Review articles must include brief materials and methods, be well-focused, and sensibly document evaluations of timely related subjects. The abstract should be structured and not exceed 250 words. A total of 5 Tables/Figures are allowed to appear and there is no limitation on the number of references.

Systematic Reviews should raise a clear narrow research question and be done using a reproducible methodology, including an inclusive search protocol to seek out unpublished and published works using a screening process according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, PRISMA diagram, and PRISMA checklist to evaluate the quality of studies and bias risk, reasons for excluding studies, and also reliable and valid quality assessment instruments used to conduct the review, data extraction tools and protocols, and qualitative and quantitative analysis (meta-analysis).

Mini-Reviews represent reasonably focused and appropriately documented evaluations of timely relevant subjects. They should be written in approximately 4000 words (including tables, figures, and references). The subjects may be controversial or may be relevant to a sharply focused field compared to those conventionally addressed in reviews.

Short Communications aim to present a preliminary report and quickly propagate original and significant information. For example, a Short Communication may accentuate a special aspect of a question or a novel finding that may be especially noticeable. Short articles include but are not limited to innovations in modeling and simulation, development of new materials, novel theories and experiments, and mechanisms explanation, and therefore particularly influence the field rather than reports on incremental research.

Short Communications should be written in approximately 2000 words, including tables, figures, and references. The publication should have an unstructured abstract (in at most 150 words), main text, and 8-15 references, as well as 1-2 Tables/Figures.

Communications are published following the topical sections in the table of contents with the Short Communication heading.

Commentaries represent the author’s viewpoint and should contain approximately 1000 words (tables, figures, and references) to critique an original research article to be published and are conventionally submitted by the reviewers. The abstract should be unstructured and be written in 100-150 words. A total of three Tables/Figures are allowed to appear in the publication with a maximum of 10-15 references.

Case Reports are to present rare cases (described in a maximum of ~1500 words, including tables, figures, and references). These reports must contain an introduction, case description, discussion, and conclusions. Patient confidentiality must be ensured. No identifying facts should appear. The patient should provide consent if applicable. The abstract should be unstructured and not exceed 150 words. A total of 1-2 Tables/Figures are allowed to appear in the report with at most 10-15 references.

Letter to Editor represents the author’s idea (within a maximum of ~1000 words including tables, figures, and references). If a letter challenges an article’s content already appeared in the journal, the authors of the article will be provided with an opportunity to publish their response in the same issue where the letter appears. The total number of Tables/Figures should not exceed one and 10-15 references are allowed.

Manuscripts submitted must be in DOC format written with Times New Roman (size 12) and be double-spaced. Authors are advised to see an article recently published in the journal.

Blinded article file: This file should contain the main text, from Abstract to References (including tables/figures). The file should contain no information on the authors' names or initials, affiliations, or acknowledgments.

Publication Types: Original Article, Review Article, Clinical Trial, Short Communication, Letter to Editor, etc.

Article title: The title represents a brief description of the whole work and should include facts that, along with the abstract, will help to specifically and sensitively retrieve the article from electronic databases. The SKUMS journals require that information on the study design be included in the title (especially systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and randomized trials). Complex or numerous chemical formulae and long systematic names should be avoided as much as possible.

Running title: A short title of no more than 40 characters (including spaces) must be provided as well.

Authors’ names: Full names (first, middle, and family) for all the authors of an article should be provided followed by the superscript number(s) for their respective affiliation(s) (for example, Mark Junior Smiths1). The name(s) of the corresponding author(s) should be followed by an asterisk (e.g., Mark Junior Smiths*). In the case of the ambiguous family name (e.g., a double name), the ambiguity should be clarified. In addition, the affiliations of all the authors should be provided and specified with superscript numbers before correspondence information (e.g. Faculty of ….). For all authors, Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) should be provided.

Correspondence: Complete postal address(es), telephone and fax number(s) (with country and area code) and email(s) of the corresponding author(s) must be provided.

Disclosure of relationships and activities: Disclosure information of each author must be a part of the manuscript; The ICMJE has codified a uniform Disclosure Form for use by ICMJE member journals, yet the ICMJE advises the authors to adopt it for other journals. Along with this form, editors may need to declare disclosure of relationships and activities on the manuscript’s title page or other sections so that the corresponding author does not need to collect disclosure forms from all authors.

Abstract: A factual concise abstract (up to 250 words) is needed. The abstract must be assumed as separate from the main. Citing references in abstract must be avoided. In addition, non-standard abbreviations should be avoided; however, they must be defined in their first appearance if needed. The abstracts of original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses must be structured. The abstract should provide the context or background for the study and should incorporate the study's purpose, basic procedures (sampling, settings, measurements, statistics), main results including statistical and clinical significance if applicable), and conclusions.

Keywords: Three to six keywords must be provided after the abstract (Notice: Readers conventionally use search engines to retrieve publications using keywords; therefore, keywords should be identifiable for databases for visibility purposes). Keywords must be selected from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and the abstract should precisely represent the article’s content.

Notice: Original research articles may also be published in their brief format by the editor’s offer. The authors can also submit their manuscripts for potential publication in a brief format. An unstructured abstract of a maximum of 200 words is essential. The main body should be limited to 2000 words, without any headings or subheadings. At most 2 Tables and/or Figures are allowed to appear and the maximum number of references should be 15.

This section should unambiguously and summarily (up to 600 words) represent satisfactory literature. The final paragraph of this section should clearly state the work’s main objectives.

This section should give so sufficient details that readers can reproduce the procedure. The manufacturing details of the instruments used (e.g., company’s name, city, country) and their catalog number, if applicable, should also be provided. Procedures described in previous publications should be referred to, and only modifications should be explained. Potential risks that may be faced throughout the experiments should be stated. Any risks related to procedures, chemicals, or instruments should be clarified. If it is necessary to use live animals or humans, the author must clearly state that all experiments were conducted as per respective regulations and institutional instructions and also mention the institutional committee(s) that approved the study protocol. It is definitely essential that the author(s) mention the ethics code/approval, whether national or international, in this section (For more information on the ethics, details can be found in the Ethics section of the journals’ guidelines). It should also be stated that informed consent was provided by human subjects for any experimentation with them.

The sampling of observational or experimental participants (healthy individuals or patients, including controls) should be fully and clearly explained, such as inclusion and exclusion criteria and the source population. Because the relevance of such variables as age, sex, or ethnicity is not consistently known at the time of the study design, researchers should aim for the inclusion of representative populations in all study types and at least provide descriptive data for them and other related demographic variables.

The terms related to sex and gender should be used appropriately, otherwise, the gender of study participants and the sex of animals or cells must be reported, and the methods of determining sex and gender must be described. If the study has been conducted with only one sex, the authors should give the reason, except in obvious cases (e.g., prostate cancer). Authors should describe the procedure to determine race or ethnicity and explain their relevance. Authors should use precise and respectful terms to describe participants and avoid stigmatizing language.

The study's main and secondary aims-namely primary and secondary objectives-should be determined. Procedures and instruments (followed by the manufacturer's name and address in parentheses) should be explained in sufficient detail to allow the readers to repeat the study protocol. Established procedures, such as statistical methods (see below), should have references; methods that have already appeared but are not widely known should also have references and be briefly described. In addition, considerably modified or new procedures should be described and their use and limitations be mentioned and justified. All chemicals and drugs, such as generic names, doses, and administration routes must be mentioned. Scientific and gene names should be properly provided.

Data analysis methods should be clearly and sufficiently described to allow access to the original data to decide whether they are appropriate for study purposes and to verify the obtained results. If applicable, findings should be quantified and presented with appropriate measures of error or uncertainty (e.g., confidence intervals), because statistical hypothesis testing, such as p-values, alone may not represent decisive information on estimate precision and effect size. The design of the study and statistical methods should be supported by referring to standard works as much as possible. Statistical terms, symbols, and abbreviations should be defined. The statistical software package(s) including their versions must be mentioned. Exploratory analyses, including subgroup analyses, should be specified.

Results should be presented in a logical sequence through the text, tabulation, and illustrations, with the main findings, reported first. Do not repeat reporting the data through both tabulation and illustration and in the text. Data on all primary and secondary outcomes already determined in the Methods section should be provided. Supplementary materials and technical nuances can be given in an appendix so that they will also be accessible but will not interrupt the text, or they can appear only in the journal's electronic version.

Numeric results should be expressed as both derivatives (for example, percentages) and the absolute number from which the derivative had already been drawn. The number of tables and figures should be limited so that they will contribute to the argument of the study and to supporting data. Tables with numerous entries can be replaced with graphs. Technical terms in statistics should not be used non-technically, such as random (suggesting a randomizing device) and normal, significant, etc.

Data should be reported by demographic characteristics, e.g., gender and age.

It is recommended to briefly state the main results, and potential explanations or mechanisms for them at the beginning of the discussion. The novel and substantial dimensions of the work should be accentuated and the findings should be contextualized in the whole previous relevant observations. The limitations of the study and the potential implications of the observations for the clinical setting and further studies should be stated as well. If applicable, the potential impact or relationship of studied variables, including gender and age, should be discussed concerning the findings, and the data's limitations. Do not repeat the information provided in other sections of the paper.

The potential relationships between conclusions and the objective(s) of the work should be explored but unqualified arguments not sufficiently backed by the data should not be addressed. Especially, statistical and clinical significance should be clarified, and arguments about economic aspects should be avoided unless the work entails relevant economic aspects. New hypotheses must be adequately supportable and be clearly labeled.

Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the citations concerning the content of the respective references, which should be numbered sequentially in order of their appearance in the manuscript's text, and the numbers should be superscripted with no parentheses. The references should be listed in a separate section, under the References heading, following the manuscript's text, and be double-spaced. Unpublished observations or results and personal communications should be parenthesized in the text.

The references should be within the past 5 years.

References list must be organized as per the Vancouver style including the following items:

Numbered references should appear at the end of the article and consist of surnames and initials of all authors when six or less; otherwise, list the first six and then add et al. The title of the article, the name of the journal, the year of publication, the volume (issue) number, and the first and last page numbers should also be provided.

Authors. Title. Journal's name (Abbreviated according to the MEDLINE). Year; Volume (Issue): first-page number-last page number.

Notice: In case of the standardized abbreviations of the names of the journals that are not indexed in the MEDLINE, consult the ISSN List of Title Word Abbreviations available at: https://www.issn.org/services/online-services/access-to-the-ltwa

Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23-34.

For books, the names and initials of all authors, the full title, place of publication, publisher, year of publication, and page numbers should be provided.

Authors. Title. Place of publication: Publisher; Year. (pp. Page Numbers of Chapter).

For references with Digital Object Identifier (DOI), it must be also mentioned at the end of the reference.

Tables should be prepared in either DOC or RTF format. Tables are aimed to convey information briefly and show it clearly; they also increase the precision of the information presented. Tabulating data rather than reporting them in text allows for shortening the manuscript's length.

Tables must be numbered consecutively in the order of their first appearance in the text and be preceded by a short and self-explanatory title. Tables’ titles should allow readers to comprehend their content without consulting the manuscript’s text. All tables must be cited in the main text.

Give each column a short or an abbreviated heading. Authors should place explanatory matter in footnotes, not in the heading. Explain all nonstandard abbreviations in footnotes, and use symbols to explain information if needed. Symbols may vary from journal to journal (alphabet letter or such symbols as *, †, ‡, §), so check each journal's instructions for authors for required practice. Identify statistical measures of variations, such as standard deviation and standard error of the mean.

In case data from another published or unpublished source is used, permission must be obtained and the source should be acknowledged completely.

Additional tables containing backup data that are too comprehensive to be published in printable version may be accessible in the journal’s electronic version, provided by an archival service, or the authors will supply them to the readers directly. In this case, it must be informed to the readers from where this additional information can be accessed. Such tables should also be submitted with the manuscript so that they can be examined by peer reviewers.

The figures must be prepared with a resolution of at minimum 300 dpi at full size (after publication). In the case of diagnostic images including ultrasound and CT scans, and also pictures of specimens or photomicrographs, the image file should have high resolution. Before-and-after images should be taken with the same resolution, light color, and direction. Because blots serve as primary evidence in a wide variety of scientific articles, the journal may require the deposition of their original images on the website.

Figures, as with tables, should be self-explanatory, because they may be used separately in slide presentations. Titles and detailed explanations must be provided in the captions, not on the illustrations.

Photomicrographs should have internal scale markers. Arrows, symbols, or letters in photomicrographs should be detectable from the background. The internal scale should be explained and staining methods in photomicrographs should be identified.

Figures should be numbered consecutively according to the order in which they appear in the text. If a figure has been published previously, the source must be stated and written permission obtained from the copyright holder must be submitted for its reproduction. Permission is essential under any circumstances except for materials in the public domain.

Notice: All tables and figures must be inserted into and cited in the manuscript’s main text (e.g., Table 1).

Measures of height, length, weight, and volume should be expressed in metric units or their decimal multiples.

The temperature should be expressed in degrees Celsius (°C). Blood pressure should be expressed in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) unless other units are specifically required.

Authors must consult the Information for Authors for reporting units of measures and should report laboratory information in both local and International System of Units (SI).

Editors may require the authors to use non-SI or alternative units because SI units are not universally used. Medication concentrations can be reported in either SI or mass units, but the alternative units should be parenthesized where appropriate.

Only standard abbreviations should be used, as a nonstandard abbreviation may confuse the readers. The parenthesized abbreviation preceded by the spelled-out abbreviation should be provided at first appearance unless the abbreviation represents a standard unit of measurement.

The authors must briefly state any conflict of interest in the final paragraph of the manuscript. All sources of funding must be mentioned. If the research has been funded by no institution, the following sentence should appear in this section:

“Authors declare no conflict of interests”.

To prevent the authors’ potential conflict of interest from being overlooked, it is strongly recommended to provide this information in the cover letter. Authors must determine all types of potential conflicts of interests before the initiation of the review process. A declared conflict of interests will not necessarily lead to rejection of the manuscript rather the editors will be required to publish the declared conflict of interests in the accepted manuscript. The following are some examples of conflicts of interests:

1. Direct financial payment made to an author for the study or manuscript production by the funder of a service or product examined in the study,

2. Ownership of contributions by an author in the company funding a product service examined in a study (or in a company funding a competing product), and

3. Personal consulting for other institutions or companies with a financial interest in promoting specific products and services.

Authors must declare the source of funding for their research at the submission of the manuscript. Suppliers of equipment and materials including their place (e.g., city, country) should be stated as well. The information will appear in the Acknowledgements of the published manuscript.

The SKUMS journals are open access and no fee is charged for processing and/or publishing manuscripts by these journals except for the Journal of Herbmed Pharmacology (JHP).

The institutional ethics code and code of Iranian Registry Clinical Trial (IRCT) or International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) should be written in the “Ethical approval” section, if applicable.

Authors must disclose any types of technical, scientific, financial, and statistical assistance. Contributors who do not fulfill the criteria of authorship may be shortly acknowledged in the final paragraph of the manuscript. All funding sources must be disclosed.

In the Acknowledgements, the date and the code of the approval document issued for the protocol of the study from which the paper has been obtained must be stated.

All authors of the articles published in SKUMS Journals should have an ORCID in the Scientific CV platform. If needed, please refer to the ORCID website and register to have your ORCID issued.

Submissions presented as preprints are also processed. A preprint is a draft of an article available online before submission to a journal. If the manuscript is accepted for publishing, the authors are strongly encouraged to link from the preprint to their formal publication via its Digital Object Identifier (DOI). Authors are allowed to present their preprints with no restrictions on place and time.

Conference papers are considered to be expanded and high-quality provided that they meet the requirements below: (1) Expanded to the requirements of original research, (2) referred to and appear on the article’s first page, (3) obtained the acceptable permission from the copyright holder if the authors do not hold the copyright of the published conference paper, and (4) declared by the authors in the cover letter that the manuscript is a conference paper and changes concerning the original conference paper. Pilot studies (including works of unqualified statistical robustness) are not published.